Four common arguments for acknowledging AI use (and why they are wrong)Educators may want AI to be used well or to go away entirely, write Chloe Salisbury and Luke Zaphir. Here, they take on a central piece of AI lore and offer ways forwardChloe Salisbury, Luke Zaphir The University of Queensland
What happened to creativity in the classroom?When generative AI leads 150 students to submit the same ‘creative’ work, something is afoot in arts and humanities education. Here, Leah Henrickson and Luke Zaphir turn insights from cognitive science into ways to use AI to boost students’ creativityLeah Henrickson, Luke Zaphir The University of Queensland
Should we kill the essay?Long-form writing seems to have become a battleground for the showdown between AI and academic integrity. With technology exposing the essay’s flaws, Luke Zaphir offers ways to reinforce this storied assessment taskLuke Zaphir The University of Queensland
The trouble with Bloom’s taxonomy in an age of AIWhen using large language models to create learning tasks, educators should be careful with their prompts if the LLM relies on Bloom’s taxonomy as a supporting dataset. Luke Zaphir and Dale Hansen break down the issues Luke Zaphir , Dale HansenThe University of Queensland
Is critical thinking the answer to generative AI? Designing assessment that tests critical thinking has value and practicality, so the challenge is figuring out questions that flummox the AI without creating wildly difficult problems for students, write Luke Zaphir and Jason M. Lodge Luke Zaphir , Jason M. LodgeThe University of Queensland