ߣߣ��Ƶ’s banning of two Chinese academics is ironic evidence of Beijing’s malign influence on ߣߣ��Ƶn values, China scholars say, as Canberra adopts some of the communist state’s security methods.

ߣߣ��Ƶ has cancelled the visas of translators Li Jianjun and Chen Hong, reportedly because of adverse assessments from the ߣߣ��Ƶn Security Intelligence Organisation (Asio). The assessments are understood to stem from their membership of a WeChat group involving a parliamentarian under Asio investigation.

Asio has not responded to media questions about the matter, saying that it does not comment on “intelligence matters”.

Professor Chen and Mr Li have longstanding associations with ߣߣ��Ƶ and have visited many times. The two manage ߣߣ��Ƶn studies centres at Shanghai’s East China Normal University and Beijing Foreign Studies University (BFSU), teaching courses on Antipodean culture and literature.

ߣߣ��Ƶ

Mr Li declined an interview with ߣߣ��Ƶ, saying he had been advised that speaking to the media would not help his case, but said that Asio’s assessment was incorrect. “The WeChat group was simply a friendly social chat group [with] no intention of influence or interference attempted at all,” he said.

Professor Chen said that he had initially dismissed the notification of his visa cancellation as “fraud spam”. He protested to immigration authorities about the “gross mistake” but his email went unanswered.

ߣߣ��Ƶ

 in China’s Global Times tabloid, he said ߣߣ��Ƶ was mimicking the US in “ravaging” mutually beneficial academic and cultural exchanges. He said that he was one of China’s most “outspoken advocates” of a better understanding with ߣߣ��Ƶ, publishing and teaching about Antipodean literature, culture and society, “only to be deemed a risk to ߣߣ��Ƶ’s security”.

“Some of my perspectives are critical of Canberra’s China policy,” he acknowledged, suggesting that ߣߣ��Ƶn authorities were “scared of such candid opinions”.

David Brophy, a University of Sydney historian specialising in China and inner Asia, said that ߣߣ��Ƶ – like China – had become a country that “bans foreign academics with critical views of its policies”.

“When China invokes vague security concerns to restrict the entry of foreign academics, Western academia unanimously disapproves of that. We’ve ended up in more or less the same situation.”

ߣߣ��Ƶ

Dr Brophy said Chinese ߣߣ��Ƶn colleagues were expressing reluctance to voice criticisms of ߣߣ��Ƶ-China relations, afraid of becoming “the next object of investigation for foreign interference” because they engaged with people in China in the course of their work. “These things seem to be potential triggers for the security agencies to take an interest.”

Mr Li is secretary general of the Chinese Association for ߣߣ��Ƶn Studies and has held visiting fellowships at the ߣߣ��Ƶn National University, La Trobe University and King’s College London. He is a second-generation member of a vibrant academic exchange community that began when a group of middle-aged Chinese postgraduates – nicknamed the “Gang of Nine” – arrived at the University of Sydney in 1979 to study literature and linguistics.

He took over running BFSU’s ߣߣ��Ƶn Studies Centre from Hu Wenzhong, a Gang of Niner who founded the centre in 1983, and is now a PhD candidate with Western Sydney University (WSU).

Mr Li is seeking to have the visa cancellation overturned, with the university’s assistance. In a message to other Chinese students, vice-chancellor Barney Glover reassured them that WSU was “committed to providing a safe, supportive and harmonious environment for your learning and research”.

ߣߣ��Ƶ

john.ross@timeshighereducation.com