ߣߣÊÓÆµ

Grant winners - 3 July 2014

Published on
July 3, 2014
Last updated
June 10, 2015

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

The environmental IoT: understanding and managing the natural environment through “Internet of Things� technology

  • Award winner: Yunting Ge
  • Institution: Brunel University
  • Value: £98,362

Power generation and heat recovery from industrial waste heat with advanced CO2 thermodynamic power cycles (CO2 power)

Sustainable digital fabrication of low-energy passive wireless sensors

Ìý

Medical Research Council

Research Grants

  • Award winner: Elizabeth Fisher
  • Institution: University College London
  • Value: £378,426

Investigating a neuronal subcellular transcriptome by the novel technique of RNA TU-tagging, in a normal and ALS-related mouse model

ߣߣÊÓÆµ

ADVERTISEMENT

Role of early B cell factor-1 (Ebf1) in replication initiation of normal B cells and in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (BCP-ALL)

Active assistance for psychological therapy (actissist): software to improve access and adherence to CBT targeting key relapse indicators in psychosis

ߣߣÊÓÆµ

ADVERTISEMENT

Ìý

National Institute for Health Research

Health Technology Assessment Programme

A pragmatic adaptive sequential placebo controlled randomised trial to determine the effectiveness of glycerin trinitrate for retained placenta (Got-it trial)

Community-based rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty (CORKA)

Public Health Research Programme

Does active design increase walking and cycling? Evaluation of a natural experiment examining whether moving into housing in East Village increases family levels of physical activity, particularly walking and cycling

In detail

Arts and Humanities Research Council

Award winner: Michael Northcott
Institution: University of Edinburgh
Value: £708,920 (AHRC contribution)

ߣߣÊÓÆµ

ADVERTISEMENT

Caring for the future through ancestral time: engaging the cultural and spiritual presence of the past to promote a sustainable future

This project will investigate whether different understandings and practices of time are implicated in differing responses to intergenerational responsibility to “care for the future� and particularly the responsibility of the present generation to mitigate its impact on future climates. “We want to discover whether those who get involved with climate change activism from a faith position are motivated by a temporal horizon that is longer-term and more intergenerational than the cost-benefit paradigm that frames investment decisions in commercial and public agencies,� Michael Northcott said.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT