The Office for Students (OfS) has launched an investigation into governance at the University of Greater Manchester in the latest blow to an institution that has been mired in controversy.  

The English watchdog said it will examine whether the university’s governing documents upheld the public interest governance principles outlined in its regulatory framework, and whether it had “adequate and effective management” to comply with the OfS’ conditions of registration.

These principles state that the university must be governed by a “fit and proper person” and “operates openly, honestly, accountably and with integrity and demonstrates the values appropriate to be recognised as an English higher education provider”.

The regulator said the launch of the investigation signalled that it had “identified potential concerns that require further scrutiny” but noted the decision to open an investigation “does not mean that any form of non-compliance or wrong-doing has taken place”.

ߣߣ��Ƶ

It comes after Greater Manchester police launched an investigation into alleged fraud and bribery at the institution earlier this year. It issued six arrest warrants at seven properties in Greater Manchester and the south of England as part of “initial enquiries” into the alleged financial irregularities.

The university’s vice-chancellor, George Holmes, was suspended in May over the “serious allegations”, along with the university’s provost and “another senior member of academic staff”.

ߣߣ��Ƶ

The university has since been led on an interim basis by Greg Walker, pro vice-chancellor (academic).

The OfS said that it will co-operate with the police while conducting its own independent investigation.

A university spokesperson said it will “co-operate fully with inquiries from the OfS”.

“The university remains committed to the highest standards of integrity and accountability and we will work closely with the OfS.

ߣߣ��Ƶ

“It is important to note, as it says in the OfS statement, that ‘the decision to open an investigation does not mean that any form of non-compliance or wrong-doing has taken place’.”

“The university’s internal procedures are ongoing and involve all relevant parties. As a result, we are not able to comment further until such matters are concluded.”

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducation.com