ߣߣƵ

Site disruption

We are doing some essential maintenance work and you will not be able to register or update your profile setting until we've finished, which should be at about 9pm this evening.

We apologise for any inconvenience - you will be able to register shortly. In the mean time you will still be able to log in as usual.

Reform threatens Bangor funding after students refuse to host MPs

Right-wing party leaders criticise students and suggest public funding should be revoked after Welsh university society snubs members

Published on
February 10, 2026
Last updated
February 10, 2026
Red and blue 'Keep Out' signs on a fence by the sea
Source: iStock/Paul Gorvett

A Reform politician has said Bangor University students should have their access to student loans revoked after a campus society refused to hold an event with the party’s members.

The university’s Debating and Political Society said it had refused a request from Jack Anderton, a political campaigner linked to Reform UK, and Sarah Pochin, Reform MP for Runcorn and Helsby, to attend Bangor and hold a question and answer session 

In a statement circulating on social media, the society said the request was refused “in line with our values”. 

The group said it had “zero tolerance for any form of racism, transphobia, or homophobia displayed by the members of Reform UK”. 

ߣߣƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

“Their approach to the lives of others is antithetical to the values of welcoming and fair debate that our society has upheld for 177 years,” it continues. 

Reform officials criticised the response. Writing on X, the party’s deputy leader Richard Tice says: “In line with our values, if Bangor Uni does not believe in free speech, then British taxpayers should not have to fund them. Perhaps remove all government funding and no student loans for Bangor students. The phone will ring very soon.”

ߣߣƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

Similarly, Zia Yusuf, Reform’s head of policy, claimed that the institution receives £30 million in state funding each year – “much of which comes from Reform-voting taxpayers”.

“I am sure they won’t mind losing every penny of that state funding under a Reform government,” he writes. “After all, they wouldn’t want a racist’s money would they?”

Claire Hughes, Labour’s MP in Bangor, described Reform’s response as “pathetic”. She posted on X: “Reform offer nothing but division. Fancy accusing Bangor University of ‘banning’ Reform and issuing threats. All because a debating society turned them down…?” 

University free speech campaigners have also weighed in, with the Alumni for Free Speech group writing that student societies are “free to decide who they invite” but warning that “blanket ‘not welcome’ statements are a governance red flag” that “risk normalising informal exclusion and chilling lawful debate”.

ߣߣƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

New laws that came into force last year place a greater onus on universities to protect and promote free speech on campuses but they only apply in England.

Recent polling by the Higher Education Policy Institute found that more than a third of students in the UK believe representatives of Reform should be banned from speaking at universities, despite the majority agreeing that higher education institutions should promote free speech.

Bangor University told the BBC that said societies were run by the students’ union, and it welcomed debate “across the political spectrum”.

In its statement, the society said it was “proud to be the first of the debating unions to take a stand against Reform UK”. 

ߣߣƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

“We strongly implore our fellow societies to join us in keeping hate out of our universities”.

helen.packer@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Related universities

Reader's comments (5)

Reform has more support than any other Party and might form the next Government - Us as supposedly the bastions of free speech and academic/intellectual open enquiry should be engaging with Reform (and bet these students would welcome the Greens who - like all the parties - have their fair share of daft & destructive policies).
We might not like Farage and the rest of is party but it is a mainstream political party which describes itself as Centre Right at about 30% or so in the polls. We need to distinguish such parties from Tommy Robinson and others in my view and this does not help.
Just because you dislike someone's opinions, it's not a good idea to refuse to hear them... I'm sure Bangor students could run rings around them in debate, far more telling than telling them they may not come at all. I still remember the great fun we had in the early 1980s when a representative of the IRA turned up on the University of York campus. The poor dear was heckled to tears... and that's before the party poppers started going off. Then he almost had a childish accident!
Well if you are heckling and letting off party poppers (rather childish?), surely you are "refusing to hear them" or engage with their arguments which is just as bad. And of course, this is exactly what ReformUK want to happen, banning or disrupting just provides them with the ammunition they seek in depicting their opponents as intolerant in my opinion. I assume that the IRA person in question justifed the use of political violence and terrorism? Tbis simply is not the case here and the two are not in any way comparable.
However much commentators want to criticise the society in question (and they are free to do so) - the society is not the University. The comments from senior Reform members suggest they either are pretty ill-informed about what they are commenting on or, much more worrying, they are prepared to use taxpayers money, and risk thousands of jobs, just to target institutions they dislike. Not something to be ignored for people who value free speech!

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT