Incoherent student visa policies are undermining economic growth and helping to convert ߣߣ��Ƶ into a “low-skilled guest worker society”, according to immigration expert Abul Rizvi.

Dr Rizvi has warned that the recent removal of limits on overseas students’ working hours risks subverting international education and reviving the problems of over a decade ago, when enrolments were motivated by migration and work opportunities rather than course quality.

He said foreign students were increasingly competing for low-skilled jobs with backpackers, Pacific Island agricultural labourers and “trafficked asylum seekers”, amid rampant exploitation and wage theft.

All this ran counter to the policy imperative of recruiting “high-performing students” to feed skilled migration and fuel ߣߣ��Ƶ’s economic and population growth.

ߣߣ��Ƶ

Addressing a University of Melbourne����on higher education students’ experiences, Dr Rizvi said ߣߣ��Ƶ’s public attitudes and policies towards foreign students had long been contradictory.

He said students had underpinned a skilled migration push that had “made ߣߣ��Ƶ the youngest, most diverse and – until Covid – the fastest growing population in the developed world”. Yet international students who stayed on had been decried as “back-door” migrants, even during the early 2000s when the link between student visa policy and migration had been “very explicit”.

ߣߣ��Ƶ

An August����from parliament’s Joint Standing Committee on Migration concluded that ߣߣ��Ƶ should strive to convince “the best and brightest international students…to stay here, particularly to fill persistent skills shortages in the economy”. Yet Dr Rizvi said the “genuine temporary entry requirement” in student visa applications suggested that people “harbouring thoughts of permanent migration” should be rejected.

A Department of Home Affairs����says the requirement is not intended to exclude students who apply for permanent residence after developing skills that “ߣߣ��Ƶ needs”. But it also insists that the student visa programme “is not a way for international students to maintain ongoing residency in ߣߣ��Ƶ”.

Dr Rizvi, a special adviser with strategic consultants Michelson Alexander and a former immigration department deputy secretary, said “the government wants to have it a bit each way”.

He said Canberra’s aspiration to rebuild net overseas migration to about 235,000 a year, as articulated in the��, would be “impossible to deliver without a very strong contribution from overseas students”.

ߣߣ��Ƶ

But that contribution looked increasingly unlikely, with Chinese students leaving ߣߣ��Ƶ at twice the rate of other nationalities, and applications from India and Nepal declining “significantly” even before the pandemic.

Dr Rizvi said international education was being undermined by the poaching of students and worker exploitation that had “overwhelmed” the Fair Work Ombudsman – a problem likely to escalate, with ߣߣ��Ƶ expanding the Pacific Labour Scheme for low-skilled islanders and flagging an agricultural worker visa akin to widely criticised guest worker schemes of the US and Europe.

“We now have students with unlimited work rights in tourism, hospitality, retail and agriculture,” Dr Rizvi said. “That is a fundamental change to ߣߣ��Ƶn society. It’s a fundamental change I thought ߣߣ��Ƶ would never make.”

john.ross@timeshighereducation.com