ߣߣÊÓÆµ

World in motion: columns by rankings editor Phil Baty

Published on
September 23, 2008
Last updated
May 22, 2015

• World in Motion: The responsibility on conducting surveys

• World in Motion: So now we get to the hard part

• World in Motion: How can we trust universities?

• World in Motion: Global university rankings are simply not going to go away

• World in Motion: The data are flowing in

• World in Motion: For the new and improved 2010 THE World University Rankings, we will measure reputation more vigorously

• World in Motion: From 2010, the tables will be built from the subject level upwards

ߣߣÊÓÆµ

ADVERTISEMENT

• World in Motion: Is the ratio of servers to customers in a restaurant a good proxy for the quality of the food?

• World in Motion: Do you ever get death threats?

• World in motion: If the rankings have become an accepted reference point, why change?

ߣߣÊÓÆµ

ADVERTISEMENT

• World in motion: Magazines that compile league tables have an interest in instability

• Do your job well, and you will rise

• World in motion: Why are European taxpayers paying 950,000 for a new set of rankings?

• World in motion: Is it valid to use reputation measures in university rankings

• World in motion: Rankings project manager revealed

ߣߣÊÓÆµ

ADVERTISEMENT

• World in motion: The weighting for peer review was too high and the sample was too low

• World in motion: I find it absurd that LSE is ranked 67th

• World in motion: What is a world class university

• World in motion: Rankings are no longer just an annual curiosity

ߣߣÊÓÆµ

ADVERTISEMENT

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT