Sixty per cent of the ߣߣ��Ƶn public oppose “backdoor cuts” to university funding, according to polling released by Universities ߣߣ��Ƶ, as the government considers other ways to push through its budget plans.

After the government was thwarted by Senate opposition to its plans for university funding cuts, tuition fee rises and the introduction of a performance-related element to funding, it is now said to be considering “all options” to achieve spending cuts by non-legislative means.

Simon Birmingham, the education minister, is reported to be looking at options including “axing the Higher Education Participation and Partnerships Program, or Heppp, which helps students from low-income families access university,” the on 4 December. “More worryingly for universities, the government is reportedly also considering a funding freeze for student enrolments at 2017 levels, which would, in effect, pause the demand-driven funding system,” it added.

Cuts to research funding are also said to be under consideration after the government was defeated in its original plans, which included a 2.5 per cent cut in university funding and a 7.5 per cent increase in tuition fees.

ߣߣ��Ƶ

On 5 December, Universities ߣߣ��Ƶ released the results of polling that it commissioned on the plan to achieve cuts without legislation. The poll of 1,575 ߣߣ��Ƶns, carried out by JWS Research, revealed that 63 per cent of voters say that cuts would limit access.

“Voters are also opposed to a bid to cut funding without Parliamentary approval to either university research funds or the flagship equity program that supports poorer students to go to university,” Universities ߣߣ��Ƶ said.

ߣߣ��Ƶ

“Sixty per cent of voters oppose each of those possible backdoor cuts – with even stronger levels of opposition among older voters and regional/rural voters.”

“T��� government keeps coming up with creative new ways to cut funding to public universities, but the message from voters remains the same: it’s the wrong decision for ߣߣ��Ƶ’s future,” said Universities ߣߣ��Ƶ chief executive Belinda Robinson.

“T��� Senate has been crystal clear on this too, and would quite rightly take a dim view of any bid to go around the legislative protections for higher education funding."

She added: “While ߣߣ��Ƶ is considering cutting research funding, our economic competitors are doing the opposite.

ߣߣ��Ƶ

“T��� UK is injecting an extra £2.3bn into research and development to reach their target of spending 2.4 per cent of GDP. ߣߣ��Ƶ can’t afford to disinvest in research that will drive our future economic growth.”

john.morgan@timeshighereducation.com