ߣߣƵ

‘I thought we were safe’: shock at Exeter’s humanities ‘gamble’

Leading department being in the firing line shows how changing student preferences are fundamentally reshaping universities

Published on
June 30, 2026
Last updated
June 30, 2026
A broken Roman statue, to illustrate planned cuts to the University of Exeter’s humanities department.
Source: Education Images/Getty Images

Planned cuts to the University of Exeter’s prized humanities department show no job is safe in the UK’s current wave of redundancies, according to affected academics, who add that decisions are being made based on undergraduate students’ choices rather than research strength.

Around 150 full time equivalent jobs are set to go at the south-west England institution, with 115 of them in the Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, despite it being internationally renowned. The University and College Union (UCU) puts the number of at-risk staff at more than 500 with 200 roles being axed, when part-time positions are taken into account.

Exeter ranks within the top 100 global universities for humanities provision in ߣߣƵ’s World University Rankings. It was in the top 10 for subjects including history, Classics and theology and religious studies in the last Research Excellence Framework.

Muireann Maguire, a professor in Russia and comparative literature and co-director of the Exeter Centre for Eastern European and Eurasian Studies, said she felt “existential terror” upon hearing the news, adding that the atmosphere has been “horrible” since the announcement last week.

ߣߣƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

Maguire said she has been overwhelmed by the support for Exeter’s humanities departments. “Something that I’ve noticed…is the number of people saying to me personally, or just commenting on social media, ‘I can’t believe this is happening at Exeter’, or ‘I thought Exeter at least was safe’.”  against the cuts has already gained more than 10,000 signatures.

She said there feels like there is a “split” between academics and management, and that academics feel “cheated” as “we’re very successful in terms of what we were hired to do: delivering research outcomes, writing books…but the managers aren’t concerned with those metrics”.

ߣߣƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

Instead, “they’re concerned with student recruitment and reaching particular targets, so it’s like we’re speaking two different languages,” said Maguire, who herself is at risk of redundancy.

David Miller, a former head of marketing at Exeter who now works as a consultant, highlighted how Higher Education Statistics Agency (Hesa) data show total undergraduate numbers studying history, philosophy and religious studies at Exeter held steady at around 2,000 until 2021-22 when it began to drop, reaching 1,765 in 2024-25, the latest year figures are available.

“If anything, Exeter has made the call to reduce staff numbers in these subjects later than other universities. All they are doing is aligning resources with demand”, Miller said on

Staff who teach history at Exeter countered these figures, saying they had taken over 100 extra students last year, and are likely to do so again this year – numbers that won’t yet be reflected in Hesa figures. Enrolments have been erratic in the past few years, they argued, due to the knock-on impact of the pandemic. 

Maguire said she believed that the government could be doing more to protect humanities subjects, and that government’s own strategic priorities could be fuelling the cuts.  

“The signals the government is giving are all directed towards STEM subjects, and I think that’s short sighted. STEM has its role, AI has its role, both are important, but they can work with the humanities.”

A spokesperson for Exeter reiterated that “these are proposals at this stage”, and “all colleagues affected by the proposed changes will receive all the information they need throughout the process, along with every opportunity to ask questions, raise concerns, and participate fully”.

John Heathershaw, a professor of international relations, who is also at risk, described how academics have been sent “individual files” summarising their work while at Exeter, and are being required to fill out forms explaining what they’ve achieved.

ߣߣƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

ߣߣƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

They will then be given a score between zero and three by the university – a process that will help decide which academics are made redundant if not enough take voluntary redundancy.

Heathershaw said some of the data collected about staff was inaccurate, and staff are “confused” as to “how the university could possibly mark this”. 

Some have alleged that the announcement was timed to ensure they had few options to take industrial action now that teaching and exams are over, with the university looking to confirm redundancies by the start of the next academic year.

Co-chair of the Exeter UCU branch, Michael Flexer, said the union will still hold an indicative vote on whether to pursue industrial action tomorrow, describing its base as “super motivated”.

He said telling staff if they have a job or not at the start of the academic year would cause “chaos”.

“It’s grim. People will be getting their notice in the first week of teaching…The idea that people will be able to hold it together and deliver a term of teaching before they vanish off into the horizon, is bizarre, spiteful and naive as well.”

One humanities lecturer who is at risk, but did not want to be named, feared that the cuts are likely to impact Exeter’s Research Excellence Framework performance. While they said the current REF cycle is “far enough along” that it should be unaffected, they had concerns over how the cuts will impact future cycles.

“I think they’ve effectively thrown the following REF on the fire. They’re not concerned about how the humanities go, and they’re just gambling on the sciences improving at such a rate that the humanities and social sciences don’t matter any more. That’s an extraordinary gamble.”

The university spokesperson added that they “understand that this is a worrying time for those who are affected”.

“We are not proposing to close any departments or disciplines, and under these proposals Exeter would continue to have one of the largest faculties of humanities, arts and social sciences in the UK.”

ߣߣƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (11)

HE is a massive Industry and no industry survives if it lacks customers - the data is, presumably, painfully clear in that certain subjects can no longer recruit the UG punters? And in no way can the R-income in subject X cover the cost of YY academics if T-income is significantly reducing (25% & 37% as cited above?!); and probably in subject areas where there is not the recruitment of high-fees international Ss to subsidise the R-cost?
But the government controls the access to "customers" through visas, the hostile environment for immigrants (which includes international students), and student fees. UG recruitment is also affected by government policy- when languages were no longer compulsory at GSCE the numbers of UG students taking languages then also declined. This decline in UG then leads to a lack of language teachers which then furthers the decline. We can talk about HE as an industry but the access to "customers" is part of government policy and can be changed on a whim!
I sympathise (of course...) and the points system sounds grotesque, but when an academic doesn't mention teaching re what they were "hired to do," I do wonder...
Perhaps they're on a research-only contract.
Humanities is a Teaching Economy and it is as simple as that. Income from teaching pays our salaries. Research income allows us to have research leave and research tine in our contracts.
Are we REALLY going to throw away the accumulated knowledge, wisdom, and creative work of civilization by ceasing to teach or study it? Do we REALLY want to bring on a second "Dark Ages"--when we could so easily avoid it?
A bit melodramatic in my view. It's all about downsizing and rebalancing of the sector in my view. The present number of Humanities staff is not some Platonic abstraction to be maintained at all clsts as an ideal state, but simply a variable that rises and falls. There will always be people studying and teaching these subjects but it would seem less than currently. We can not assume that the present size of the sector is the right size. It's all very dreadful and brutal for those at risk of course (though we have all known it was coming), as it is in every sector of professional life. Languages stopped being compulsory at Key Stage 4 in 2004, twenty-two years ago, so it must have been obvious at the time that it would decline at degree level as a result. The same was also true of Philosophy. Why Unis kept appointing younger colleagues into precarious roles is beyond me. So we will have to exploit those "transferable skills" we have been boasting about for so long.
In my experience at other universities tensions have been simmering under the surface of collegiality because subject areas able to recruit students in high numbers have seen staff-student-ratios rocket and work pressures massively escalate while cross subsidising subject areas that have under recruited for many years and as a result benefitted from tiny staff-student-ratios. At no time have, in my experience at least, members of the latter departments show meaningful gratitude by for example offering to pick up a greater share of administrative burdens or to give up office space to help out thos subsidising them. Rather, there seems to have been an attitude (I’m generalising of course, not everyone falls into this category) that subsidy and to be honest very comfortable working conditions can go on forever. I’m generally in favour of trying to preserve knowledge areas within universities and accept that at times some cross-subsidy is needed, but over the years my feelings have hardened as more and more I have seen evidence of a sense of entitlement and collegiality definitely not moving in both directions.
Yes indeed! That was always my experience as well.
Absolutely, the damage this imbalance causes is significant. I’m currently working at a non-RG university where arts and humanities did not face significant job cuts needed to balance their long term poor recruitment but rather recruitment freezes across the board. This lead to student to staff ratios of ~10:1 in many arts and humanities subjects and double the research time over the couple of years as the rest of the institution. Meanwhile those in my STEM department approach 30:1 due to a very successful applied science degree that supplements lower recruitment in our more traditional academic subject. This has lead to massive burnout in our department and severely damaged the likely REF return for a subject that raises the second most income per head in the university based on the last REF. This has us under even more pressure to try to cover for this institutional inflicted REF issue. Ultimately it so important that arts and humanities subjects are preserved in a sustainable form at the national level but this is not the same as protecting jobs in these subjects at all institutions.
Irish academic here-we need full disclosure on the real costs of Unis-publication of all salaries-in Ireland, the piece-meal restoration of pay (1%) cut to bail out the banks in 2008 Credit Crisis was tied to the TUI union agreeing to 'professorships' and 'deans'-corporate posts, €220,000.00 per person-that's 6 full time assistant lecturer posts. Could have made all the hourly paid lecturers (for example) permanent for the price of these 'deanships' (harvested from what were academic teaching posts). The word 'strategic' is a red flag. Also money for buildings, AI fantasies, etc. Never about education.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT