ߣߣƵ

Nottingham union plans marking boycott over job cut proposals

Planned boycott at Nottingham could disrupt some students’ ability to graduate, while staff at London South Bank University are also set to vote on industrial action

Published on
May 1, 2026
Last updated
May 1, 2026
The modern purpose-built buildings of the Jubilee Campus, Nottingham University
Source: iStock/Guida Simoes

Union members at the University of Nottingham have warned that a planned marking and assessment boycott could prevent students from graduating if not resolved.

The University and College Union (UCU) announced that Nottingham staff will boycott all marking and assessments in response to leaked proposals that could see 600 jobs cut.

The university said that “nothing has been finalised regarding redundancies”, with a council meeting set to take place on 6 May to discuss the proposals.

The boycott is planned to start on 20 May after 87 per cent of UCU members voted yes to the action on a turnout of 64 per cent.

ߣߣƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

The union warned that the industrial action would see all marking and assessments boycotted for the rest of the academic year, “effectively prevent[ing] students from graduating”.

“While we respect our employees’ right to take industrial action, the fact this is being done to create maximum disruption for our students at an already stressful time, and before the draft business case has been discussed, is really disappointing,” a Nottingham spokesperson said.

ߣߣƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

They added that there would be support in place to minimise disruption and that the proposals are “subject to meaningful consultation with the unions”.

More than 300 staff members have already left the institution in recent years under voluntary redundancy schemes and the university also announced plans in December to suspend recruitment to 42 courses.

The union said it had reached an agreement with management during the previous phase of cuts that no worker would be “forced out” until at least the end of October 2026, and that the university would “meaningfully engage with UCU to avoid course suspensions in time for the 2026 recruitment cycle”.

In light of the latest leaked cost-saving proposals, UCU said it believed the university had now “broken” that commitment.

“T University of Nottingham is on notice that it needs to rule out compulsory redundancies and work with staff to protect jobs and student provision,” said UCU general secretary Jo Grady.

It comes as a strike ballot also opens to UCU members at London South Bank University (LSBU) over proposals to divide academic workers into two “career pathways”, with some existing academics moved into new “teaching and scholarship” roles.

ߣߣƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

New starters to the university may also be denied access to the Teachers’ Pension Scheme, UCU said.

Tara Dean, provost at LSBU, said the proposals, which the university is currently consulting on, will create more teaching time for students, support financial sustainability and retain “a similar number of academic jobs”.

ߣߣƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

She said the number of occupied posts would be reduced by approximately 15 across the university.

The union has asked management to halt the proposals and “properly engage with the union”.

A successful result in the ballot could pave the way for industrial action to begin this academic year, UCU said.

“LSBU has launched one of the most serious attacks on academic staff in higher education,” said LSBU UCU branch secretary Federica Ross. “If these measures are allowed to proceed, they risk setting a dangerous precedent. That is why we are fighting to stop them.”

Dean said the university has and will “continue to run meaningful engagement including all-staff town halls, local sessions for academics alongside individual consultation meetings where we are asking for their feedback on ideas on how our proposal might work”.

“We will work to ensure minimal disruption to students in the event of strike action and continue to be open to discussion and negotiation with the unions,” she said.

ߣߣƵ

ADVERTISEMENT

helen.packer@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

new
OK - what about the students amidst all this? Well, delays to graduation = breach of the U-S contract by the U = damages owed to the S. And the U can’t use an unfair term to the effect that industrial action is force majeure so it supposedly incurs no liability for breach. The compensation going rate is £500 for any such delay as set by some Us who honourably got on and paid out during the last phase of exams/marking boycotts - and the U should state now that it will pay out automatically; not expect Ss to complain, go to the OIA., whatever. If a particular S loses a job offer, then he/she can seek larger damages - subject to the usual rules of contract in having to try and mitigate any financial losses. The U can recover some of the cost of the £500 payouts by refusing to accept partial performance from the non-markers and hence not pay them at all; or it might dock part of their pay calculated on what %age of the job is setting exams, marking, submitting marks to exam boards, etc. As was done during Covid, the U could introduce emergency mechanisms for assessing degree results based on the S’s track record - and/or it could bring in ‘scab’ labour or require its academics not involved in the industrial action to set exams, mark them and finals dissertations, etc. It is because there are such ways to proceed that the U can’t hide behind a force majeure clause even if it has one in the probably fuzzy U-S contract. Ideally the OfS/OIA,CMA/Trading-Standards will be pointing out all the above so as to fulfill their consumer protection roll (as in the OfS title!) ‘for Students’. All the above is set out in the 2021 third edition of Farrington & Palfreyman on The Law of Higher Education (OUP) - ch 12 on The Student Contract, section J on The Student as Consumer.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT